Given Yale`s status as a non-profit institution, the research, education, and teaching conducted at Yale should be beneficial to the general public and/or advance Yale`s educational and research mission, and not solely or primarily for the commercial benefit of an external party. Research, clinical trials, training, and other educational activities funded by entities external to Yale are conducted through the PSO. A legal agreement between at least two parties that describes the information that the parties wish to share with each other for specific evaluation purposes, but which aims to restrict wider use and dissemination. The CDA/NDA agreements are coordinated by ogca in cooperation with ICDO (uaf-nda@alaska.edu). UAF has a preferred standard NDA model. Please contact uaf-nda@alaska.edu for more information. OTAs are not grants, cooperation agreements or contracts. When the UAF receives an OTA, we need to pay close attention to the terms of the agreement, as they are likely to be different from what we are used to in federal grants and contracts. IGSAs are agreements between the military and a state or local government that serve the best interests of both parties and improve facility support services for the preparation of missions, soldiers and families. In the event that a proponent is located outside the United States or if a sponsored project involves the use of an international subcontractor, the principal investigator must contact and work with OGCA to negotiate the international agreements necessary for these situations. Many treaty issues arise in international relations and must be taken into account before concluding such agreements. Some of these topics are: Material Transfer Agreement (MTA): An agreement that regulates the transfer of research material between the university and a third party.

These agreements are managed by the Office of Technology Management. If any of the above conditions are met, the work falls under Stanford`s guidelines for conducting sponsored research. A funding mechanism that can be used by federal organizations when a program requires more participation and restrictions from the organization than a grant, but that requires less oversight from the organization than a contract. The primary purpose of the relationship is to transfer money, goods, services, or anything of value to the university to achieve a public goal of support or stimulation authorized by federal law. This type of agreement is generally governed by the OMB`s Uniform Guidelines if the proponent is a federal agency. A Memorandum of Understanding is a written document that describes a cooperative relationship between two parties who wish to work together on a project or achieve an agreed goal. A Memorandum of Understanding serves as a legal document and describes the terms and details of the partnership agreement. A memorandum of understanding is more formal than an oral agreement, but less formal than a contract. Organizations may use a Memorandum of Understanding to enter into and define cooperative arrangements, including service partnerships or agreements to provide technical support and training. A memorandum of understanding can be used whether or not the money is exchanged under the agreement. (www.uaf.edu/mou-moa/) A mechanism for the acquisition of a product or service with specific obligations for the promoter and the recipient. Typically, the sponsor details a research topic or service and the methods used to conduct the research or service, although some sponsors award contracts in response to unsolicited proposals.

Some achievements are expected within a certain time frame. The method of implementing the action plan is generally less flexible. The idea for the project usually comes from the sponsor. If the proponent is a federal agency, it is subject to the Federal Acquisitions Regulations. Grants.gov Community Blog In the United States, potentially valuable intellectual property rights can expire if important research information about a potential UTU invention is disclosed in advance. Before meeting with others to discuss collaboration on specific research topics or discuss the commercial aspects of BAT inventions, UTD researchers should ensure that an NDA is established stating that the parties will not disclose/use the designated confidential information. The University has developed various contracts or agreements to meet the needs of the faculty`s various research interests and service obligations. These agreements are good starting points for the development of contracts with various organizations. Agencies can also have their own agreements and use them as a starting point for negotiations.

There have been other agreements, commonly referred to as “service agreements,” in which Yale performs work such as providing medical services at a local clinic or “paid” work. In the typical “fee-for-service” agreement, the external entity would own the research results, including intellectual property (IP), and impose confidentiality obligations on Yale, possibly including the prevention or severe restriction of publications. Such conditions are generally not acceptable to Yale, as such conditions in the context of research conducted at Yale should allow Yale to control the research (the conduct of the research belongs to the person in the faculty), the results of that research should be made available to the public through publication and presentation, and Yale should own new intellectual property, which results from the commitment. .